And thus
I shall begin by saying first, let us collaborate. For you, before anything
else, have been granted exactly what I lack and I have, dare I say in
turn, been given insights into the nature of reality which on someone
like you God would be most reluctant to bestow.
That's
all I'll say here and now, but that—for you—should be enough.
When
those from IOP rejected my article one of reasons they gave me was
that they didn't like my final conclusion. But let me show you what I
had written.
A simple analysis of only the evidence I have presented here will demonstrate beyond the shadow of a doubt that Newton's theory of light and colours is irrecoverably flawed. A little deeper analysis, on the other hand, shall prove to be even more far-reaching. Toward that end consider the implications of the following line of reasoning: Since there is no doubt that in the subjective prismatic observations the majority of the spectral colours (red, blue, yellow, green) do no longer behave as in the hitherto mainstream Newtonian understanding the entire field of Optics, as thus far understood, can necessarily must be no longer valid also.
Now,
whatever exactly they meant by not liking
my
conclusion the simple-flat-plain truth is that the conclusion
is entirely valid and correct. And let's not beat around a
dead bush, if you—a physicist specialised in Optics—can't arrive
to that conclusion by making use only of your knowledge and reason
then you are either a complete moron who must have bought your PhD
online or otherwise a gargantuan pervert and charlatan. Indeed there
are no other possibilities, and I am certainly therefore not in the
least inclined to suddenly become apologetic merely for calling it as simple as indeed it is.
I, on the
other hand, did not only arrive at that conclusion rationally. I have
also verified experimentally that what I said is correct. That's why
I have been able to come up over the years with a lot of hitherto
unknown evidence that is unshakable, yet shocking for the most.
Take for
example nothing else but my video presentation of those so-called
Newton's rings. Who would have believed that 350 years after
generations upon generations of people have so many times struggled with the
cumbersome experiment devised by Newton in order to see those rings, someone
will one day come nonchalantly out of the blue to show the world how to simply project the image of those
rings onto a screen by using nothing else beside that necessary
plano-convex lens. And then, again, who would have expected
to see that the same results will be obtained regardless of the
orientation of the lens relative to the light source, which once
again is totally contrary to the Newtonian-conventional position... Who would have? Well, let me answer that question: No one would have!
Hello. Today, May 29, 2016, I am in earnest returning to work after enduring my longest ever period of a total, comprehensive intellectual drought. And this time it is all--it shall be all--for you, my dear and as yet unknown intellectual companion and partner-collaborator in what shall become a common endeavour-journey-quest for that that is, today, our tomorrow's understanding, knowledge, wisdom. Welcome.
At this point my only personal wish is to be able to in truthfulness convey to you the same unadulterated message that has been driving me (in the same manner, as well as in the same direction) since one day in the September of the year 1990. That's why from time to time I'll offer you, as we'll straddle on our own both longitudinally and across the fields, some little bits and pieces of all kinds of things that I will deem appropriate and useful. For the most part, however, the only bits and pieces that I will fully share with you will be those of the physics that I've been blessed and gifted with to learn, see, understand, shape, model, paint. So, for the time being, you, my friend, put your feet up, light up your pipe, pull down the blinds, turn off your phone, and then begin to listen. Carefully. Unhurriedly. Wisely. The show is just about ready to begin. Enjoy, but don't forget to judge. It's your duty.